<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Poker on Bulrush Labs — Richard Tibbetts</title><link>https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/tag/poker/</link><description>Recent content in Poker on Bulrush Labs — Richard Tibbetts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/tag/poker/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>There Can Be Too Many Suckers at the Table</title><link>https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/2010/12/12/there-can-be-too-many-suckers-at-the-table/</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/2010/12/12/there-can-be-too-many-suckers-at-the-table/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone knows the old saw about poker: If you can’t spot the sucker, it’s probably you. It’s nice to think you could sit down at a table with incompetent players and take their money. It probably works in poker. &lt;a href="http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/"&gt;Mark Suster&lt;/a&gt; applies the aphorism to angel investing in his post &lt;a href="http://www.cloudave.com/4795/angel-investing-1-dealflow-%e2%80%93-are-you-sitting-at-the-right-poker-table/"&gt;Dealflow – Are You Sitting at The Right Poker Table?&lt;/a&gt; It’s a good post, dealflow is really important. But the poker metaphor falls short. Too many suckers actually ruin a startup market.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>