<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Law on Bulrush Labs — Richard Tibbetts</title><link>https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/tag/law/</link><description>Recent content in Law on Bulrush Labs — Richard Tibbetts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/tag/law/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Real Reasons for Eliminating Non-Competes in Massachusetts</title><link>https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/2009/07/11/the-real-reasons-for-eliminating-non-competes-in-massachusetts/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:06:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/2009/07/11/the-real-reasons-for-eliminating-non-competes-in-massachusetts/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As I posted in December, there is legislation afoot to ban non-compete agreements in Massachusetts, and I support it. As momentum has picked up, more discussion has ensued. On July 22 the Boston Bar Association will host &lt;a href="https://www.bostonbar.org/ebusiness/Meetings/EventDetail.aspx?ID=3752"&gt;Freedom To Compete? A Symposium on Bills Affecting Employee Non-Compete Agreements&lt;/a&gt;, but for now the discussion is occuring online.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;One frequent claim is that we who oppose non-competes are only doing it to emulate California. To whit, in the &lt;a href="https://hypecycles.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/defense-of-non-competes/#comment-49"&gt;comment thread&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href="https://hypecycles.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/defense-of-non-competes/"&gt;Amrith Kumar’s post “In defense of employee non-compete agreements”&lt;/a&gt; he claims&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>