<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Google on Bulrush Labs — Richard Tibbetts</title><link>https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/tag/google/</link><description>Recent content in Google on Bulrush Labs — Richard Tibbetts</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/tag/google/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Yes Virginia, You Can Work on Great Technology at Startups</title><link>https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/2010/12/06/yes-virginia-you-can-work-on-great-technology-at-startups/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://bulrushlabs.com/articles/2010/12/06/yes-virginia-you-can-work-on-great-technology-at-startups/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You can work on great technology at startups. You wouldn’t think that would be a controversial statement. But it is if you believe Ted Tso’s defense of Google, &lt;a href="http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2010/11/29/google-has-a-problem-retaining-great-engineers-bullcrap/"&gt;“Google has a problem retaining great engineers? Bullcrap.”&lt;/a&gt; Ted dismisses the engineering that goes on in a startup, saying:&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Similarly, you don’t work on great technology at a startup.  Startups, by and large, aren’t about technology — at least, not the Web 2.0 startups like Facebook, Foursquare, Twitter, Groupon, etc.   They are about business model discovery.  So if you are fundamentally a technologist at heart, whose heart sings when you’re making a better file system, or fixing a kernel bug, you’re not going to be happy at a startup.   At least, not if the startup is run competently.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>